I Can't Stand the Term Krautrock but the Music's Pretty Cool
By Mr. Moderator on Jul 3, 2007
Last night on eMusic I decided to revisit the genre known as Krautrock. I can't stand that term, but on my fifth try with this genre, I think I've hit on some stuff I might like: a few songs by Neu! (eg, "Hallogallo", "Fur Immer", "E-Musik"), a half dozen songs off the first two Faust albums, and a handful of Popol Vuh songs, a band I've already liked and purchased albums by thanks to the soundtracks of Werner Herzog films. When I'm done spending quality time with these downloads, I'll revisit the music of Can, a band I've always found lacking in anything but a few good ideas.
What do you make of this Krautrock stuff? Because I've disliked the term so much, I've barely poked at it and its likely rich mine of rock nerd knuggets of knowledge. I know John Lydon talks about the influence of this stuff on PiL, but I don't hear that as much as I hear an influence on Martin Hannett's production work for Joy Division and others. This Neu! stuff I'm listening to in particular sounds like backing tracks for Ian Curtis to sing over.
Neu!, "Fur Immer"
So go ahead, call me late to the party, but now I'm here and I'm ready to catch up. I welcome your assistance and guidance, Rock Town Hall.
13 comments
Wolf City is a little more song oriented, and easier to get into.
I really like the first Neu! album, but have never heard anything else by them.
A band I like that hasn't been mentioned in this thread yet is Ash Ra Tempel. I have an awesome bootleg of them playing one, 54-minute song at a festival in Bern, Switzerland in 1974. At times it's reminscent of the great Eno/Fripp boot Air Structures but it's more of a gradual buildup from utter quiet to a torrent of noise. I highly recommend it.
Also, does Kraftwerk count as "Krautrock"? This is a serious question here, folks.
I guess the crappy parties really do seem to just go on an on, though.
If you don't care what you hear, then why not just listen to Bill O'Reilly? At least it's free.
"Isn't the attitude of the band that feels "listening pleasure be damned" just a bit fucked up?"
Yeah, but, the way it works is that the execution is focused more on doing something to see how it sounds than doing something to make it sound a certain way. Faust has lots of clumsiness in what it does and, in general, musical clumsiness drives me crazy. But with Faust, their apparent dedication to other objectives render the clumsiness irrelevant, completely beside the point. It's music that comes from an entirely different angle than the sensuous groove approach of the Stones, but as mwall mentioned, it's possible to like both for the different things they do.
Can has lots of stuff out there, and I think that the quality of their best work gets obscured by trying to pick through all their releases without a clear idea of what is essential. I think a great place to start is the album Future Days. This album exploits the elegant groove of Liebezeit's drumming and has the feel of a Fripp/Eno collaboration crossed with Bitches' Brew.
"I know it's tough to get at what I'm really saying sometimes, but like Geo said about the music of Faust...well, you know what I mean. "
Hey motherfucker, watch the snide. I like Faust and I'm tryin' my best to explain why!
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.
| « Sons of Champlin | Once in Love with Amy » |
