Comment from: sammymaudlin [Member]
Anyone else hear this? I dig the 1st one and between you me I'm starting to think KingEd is a bit of a crank.
03/24/08 @ 21:38
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
KingEd is a bit of a crank? ya think?

who gives a flaming wad?

he's right about this one.

jack white sounds like he's running out of ideas.

rich kid blues indeed.
03/24/08 @ 22:56
Comment from: Mr. Moderator [Member]
KingEd's getting his ass kicked over at Phawker. A couple of guys posting comments have had the nerve to question his expertise. I listened to the album today, and I'm standing by KingEd on this one. However, is it all White's fault, or does the Brendan Benson a few of you worship deserve some of the blame?
03/24/08 @ 23:27
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
benson's songs aren't that great either. i think the whole thing's a turd.

i just meant to say more specifically that in listening to jack white's songs, i'm beginning to hear a general same-ishness in approach that i began hearing on "get behind me satan".

03/25/08 @ 07:38
Comment from: 2000 man [Member] Email · http://www.whammoblammo.blogspot.com/
I'm picking my copy up next week, so I'll reserve judgement. I'm a little concerned, but I'm going to wait to hear it on cd. My sincerest wish is that The Greenhornes album had come out first. They're one of my favorite bands and I'd really like to see them again. Maybe things will change between this week and next!
03/25/08 @ 09:07
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
2k, agreed on the greenhornes.

but what's the difference between listening to phawker's stream (which is of very high quality) and "hearing it on cd"?

not sure i understand....
03/25/08 @ 10:56
Comment from: 2000 man [Member] Email · http://www.whammoblammo.blogspot.com/
Saturn, the difference for me is system quality. My computer sounds okay for a computer, and at lower volume levels it's actually quite enjoyable. But this is a big assed rock n' roll record, and I want to listen to it with some volume behind it and no screen with the world at my fingertips to distract me from it. For once, it's not just because I'm a snob. I really want to pay attention to this. Oh, and The Greenhornes album is supposed to be essentially "in the can," or so I've heard. Maybe this fall?

KingEd took a minor beating from some Jack White fanboys but he returned the smack in a fashion that actually made me LOL. Out loud.
03/25/08 @ 11:10
Comment from: KingEd [Member]
The difference between hearing music on your own stereo or in your car rather than on the Phawker (or any other) stream can be significant. I'd guess that the half-assed Raconteurs tunes I reviewed would better tingle the spine if cranked up on home stereo speakers. Chances are I'd still find much to dislike.

When I'm called in to do my Insta-Reviews, they're almost always done at the computer, using the same feed everyone else gets. For the Gnarls Barkley review, I actually downloaded the tracks digitally, but the file names were screwed up, and I listened to the thing in the wrong order. I've been told the album is better in its true order, but that's one I feel no need to revisit.

2000 man and saturnismine, if you're the same as the Saturn who had my back on Phawker, thanks for the support and understanding. It can be a drag sometimes informing people what trendy new release they'll end up shoving in the back of their collection a few months from now.
03/25/08 @ 11:25
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
no problem, ed. that was me. those pick-a-ninnies offered little of substance in their hissy fit criticisms of you or their support of the album.

i guess i didn't understand the difference between streaming phawker and listening to the cd because here on planet saturnismine, my computer is hooked into the mother ship so that the streamed shit comes out just as big and real as the vinyl or the cds.


03/25/08 @ 12:01
The batting average of supergroups constructed from other well-known bands in terms of quality rock is shockingly low, is it not? The few successes that I can think of at the moment: Rockpile, Led Zeppelin, CSNY, maybe a few Blind Faith songs. I mean, Asia? Tin Machine? The Raconteurs? Isn't there a rock 'n' roll equivalent to the SEC, some overarching authority that says, ok, you can form a supergroup, but only under the following conditions, and don't expect the public to bail you guys out of your risky investment in supergroup rock glory hubris.
03/25/08 @ 12:43
Comment from: dr john [Member] Email
I prefer the first album's take on ELO to the second album's take on Procol Harum.
03/25/08 @ 13:17
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
t-vox,

i wouldn't consider zeppelin a "super group" at the time of their formation: plant and bonham were unknowns. JPJ had only done session work for donovan.

they were only ever described as such retroactively.

but yeah, you're right, supergroups generally don't work.
03/25/08 @ 13:43
Comment from: 2000 man [Member] Email · http://www.whammoblammo.blogspot.com/
But what about Toto or The Alan Parsons Project? I remember people telling me they were super.
03/25/08 @ 13:59
Comment from: alexmagic [Member] Email
Isn't there a rock 'n' roll equivalent to the SEC, some overarching authority that says, ok, you can form a supergroup, but only under the following conditions, and don't expect the public to bail you guys out of your risky investment in supergroup rock glory hubris.

I’ve long thought that someone needs to be elected Mayor of Music or President of Music and be granted the power to make those kinds of hard decisions, like vetoing the formation of a supergroup or an attempted comeback, or stepping in to stop a band or artist from attempting an inadvisable genre hop or from doing a cover they have no business touching. It would have to be someone in the business with enough elder statesman status to win the music establishment over in a vote, but still be able to speak to today’s bands. A rock uniter, not a rock divider, but with the resolve to do what needs to be done.
03/25/08 @ 14:32
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
dr. john, i think you've got it just right regarding the racs' second album.
03/25/08 @ 14:38
Comment from: the great 48 [Member] Email
Wait a second. I get beef from Saturn for referring to the dilhole who owns Pat's Steaks as a "dumb guinea fuck," and yet it's okay for him to casually toss out a term like "pickaninnies"? What's next, he's going to refer to the guy who gave the "I have a dream" speech as "Martin Luther Coon"?
03/25/08 @ 14:51
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
48,

i should have looked up pick-a-ninny before using it. now i see that i've erred. since it has the word "pick" and the word "ninny" in it, i really thought it meant something like "persnicketty" and "sissified" at the same time. seriously. sorry about that.

but i can't even remember the incident you're describing...but your detailed memory of something that occupied maybe an hour of our time a few years back betrays your own sensitivity on the matter.

regardless, we can use racial or ethnic slurs in any number of ways, with varying degrees of malice and varied results, right?

i mean, noone likes to read the phrase "dumb (insert ANY racial or ethnic slur here) fuck", in reference to their own background, regardless of how dumb or how much of a fuck the individual in question might be. i think that, and, as i seem to recall, your utter unwillingness to apologize at all (on display again above), defined the roots of my objection, not the use of the use of the word "guinea", per se.

I may not have been able to articulate it that day, due to various factors, especially haste.

btw, i think you're referring to the guy at geno's, not pat's (he's the one who wants everyone to speak english when they order). i've often wondered what would happen if i went to the window of his fine establishment and ordered in ITALIAN?



03/25/08 @ 15:06
Comment from: Mr. Moderator [Member]
http://www.phawker.com/2008/03/25/mailbag-the-trouble-with-ed-king/

Ed, if this Dylan guy who's pissed at you over at Phawker writes a better review than you, you're gone, brother! I can't speak for Valania and his blog, but my people have feelers out with Dylan's people. That kid's majored in Politics AND Philosophy. No offense, but your management experience with Staples doesn't match up.
03/25/08 @ 15:13
Comment from: the great 48 [Member] Email
Saturn: actually, my memory is that I did apologize quite sincerely at the time. (And you're entirely correct, Joe Vento is indeed the dumb fuck in question, and I withdraw my slur on the fine people at Pat's.) What actually reminded me of the incident was a story last week that the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations ruled that the signs are not discriminatory, a ruling that I disagree with on a couple of levels. (Including the English major in me that shudders violently at the deeply irritating deliberate misuse of "wit," which I find nearly as gag-inducing as seafood places round these parts that claim to sell "lobstah.")

I genuinely didn't know that you didn't know the meaning of the term you used, and thought that you were deliberately using a term that I personally somehow find even more offensive than the more common ones, because it implies that the user is going out of his way to revive old slurs, as if there aren't enough in common parlance. Hence, enough momentary outrage to revive my own unfortunate choice of words. I apologize for that.
03/25/08 @ 17:07
Comment from: BigSteve [Member] Email
What I find most odd is Dylan's claim that Ed's review "spent most the time referencing mildly obscure artists." Marah may be mildly obscure, but everyone else mentioned in the review was pretty mainstream. Coming from the man who leaked the 2007 Bonaroo line-up, this is disturbing.

I think you could make the case that an insta-review is for entertainment purposes only. I've read Ed's insta's before. This one did seem loaded down with "name-dropping," but I suspect that is more of a function of The Raconteurs' lack of originality.

I'm actually not a big fan of the review-as-entertainment genre, but I suspect Dylan is going to produce the kind of fanboy mash note that is even more useless. I don't expect much from someone who doesn't know how to use the idiom "to say the least."
03/25/08 @ 17:24
Comment from: BigSteve [Member] Email
It was obvious to me from context that saturn didn't know the real meaning of pickaninny, though I briefly wondered whether the term had somehow evolved without my knowledge so that it now meant 'a ninny who is overly picky.'

This reminds me of the time last year when Mitt Romney was raked over the coals for casually using the term 'tarbaby.' I didn't think the term had enough traction to be considered offensive, but I guess it does. I've offended myself just by writing this post.
03/25/08 @ 17:48
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
48, i apologize for not remembering your apology! i may have tuned out of the thread before you issued it. but as i said at the top of my post, my memory of it all is genuinely hazy.

you're right about the Human Relations Commission's ruling: deliberate ingenuousness.

and i'm a genuine dope where alot of these terms are concerned because i grew up in a household where such things were never uttered (except by my grandmother, who had her own special terms, "pickaninny" not being one of them).

BigSteve, 48, or anyone else....do you remember someone getting raked over the coals for *properly* using the word "niggardly", the meaning of which has nothing to do with its near homonyn, the "n" word? am i remembering this correctly?
03/25/08 @ 17:57
Comment from: hrrundivbakshi [Member] Email
Hey, Sat --

You are remembering the "niggardly" event correctly. It took place, *of course*, here in the nation's capitol, where an otherwise extremely well regarded city finance administrator (or something) used the term to describe an undesirable style of spending/investment. All holy hell broke loose, and the guy ended up resigning. Which just goes to show you what happens when a bunch of belligerent, undereducated nincompoops with too much time on their hands get involved in politics. Like the man said, sheesh.

My most embarrassing moment of unintended racial offensiveness was when I used the term "let's just call a spade a spade" in a meeting with, among other people, a very good African-American friend of mine. It was so far out of my mouth that there was no real turning back ("...come on, guys, let's just call a spade a -- (gulp)), but Jerome was cool enough to recognize I had never thought of the expression like that.

HVB
03/25/08 @ 18:27
Comment from: hrrundivbakshi [Member] Email
I'd also like to apologize on behalf of all those who have yet to apologize for not apologizing enough regarding this apology issue. Still, it makes me feel good to know that there's a good feeling taking root here in this feel-good forum.

Ahhhh... HEALING!
03/25/08 @ 18:33
Comment from: the great 48 [Member] Email
You don't have anything to apologize for there, Hrrundi: the proverb comes from the Greek and predates the ethnic slur by a couple millennia. Once in college, I saw someone get so hot-headed over that one that I went and looked up the derivation just to prove her wrong. (I really disliked this woman, because she once rather brazenly ripped off one of my ideas for a paper, apparently not knowing that her professor in that class was also the advisor for my undergrad thesis.) Anyway, Plutarch said it, and not only that, but "spade" itself is a mistranslation. The original was something like "To call a fig a fig and a basin a basin."
03/25/08 @ 18:48
Comment from: dr john [Member] Email
I'd like to know what evidence Dylan has for accusing Ed of already hating the record before listening to it. I think that would be pretty hard to prove, unless Dylan can read minds.
03/25/08 @ 18:51
Comment from: BigSteve [Member] Email
I know from personal experience that one absolutely cannot use the word 'niggardly' anymore, unless you want a big mess to erupt which no amount of explanation will put right. I remember when 'spade' was not considered offensive. In fact it was a term hippies/freaks used for any black man (never a woman). It was neutral. Its origin though is the expression 'black as the ace of spades' which I can't help but hear in (I think) Graham Chapman's voice from a Monty Python sketch. Some people consider 'negro' offensive now. I can't keep up.
03/25/08 @ 20:33
Comment from: dbuskirk [Member] Email
I just know transvestites like to be called "ladies".
03/26/08 @ 00:05
Comment from: Mr. Moderator [Member]
Whereas most women under a certain age do not...
03/26/08 @ 00:07
Comment from: hrrundivbakshi [Member] Email
Hey, G48 -- all I gotta say is: huh! That's good to know, and thanks for lightening my White Man's Burden a bit!

HVB
03/26/08 @ 00:10
Comment from: general slocum [Member] Email
Mr. 48 illunimates:
Anyway, Plutarch said it, and not only that, but "spade" itself is a mistranslation. The original was something like "To call a fig a fig and a basin a basin."


What a relief. No wonder that guy flipped out all those years ago when I called him a basin. I can sleep now.
03/26/08 @ 07:38
Comment from: shawnkilroy [Member] Email
I think this is kind of funny, but KINGED's review makes me want to buy(download/steal) this record!
I love all those bold face bands...uh...except PRIMUS.

Hey Saturn, You are one articulate fuckin dego!
03/26/08 @ 09:31
Comment from: homefrontradio [Member] Email
I remember reading three years of 'White Stripes' hype until i finally heard a song by them. I've never laughed so hard in my life.

Isn't everyone bored by his amateurish shtick by now? Normally critics crucify you for a lack of artistic growth. Why the pass?

The myth of authenticity has a lot to answer for.
03/28/08 @ 02:55
Comment from: BigSteve [Member] Email
Homie, I'm with you on the Stripes. They have some defenders here, but I found the stuff I heard risible. Brilliant marketing though.

I've been checking Phawker, and there's still no sign of Dylan's corrective 'review.' I wonder if he flaked.
03/28/08 @ 09:26
Comment from: hrrundivbakshi [Member] Email
Homefront, BigSteve, all I can say on the topic of the White Stripes is: WE REACH!

For the record (not that it should be any surprise), I'm quite certain we've got e. pluribus Gergley on our side as well. Anybody else want to join us on Team Immune-From-Hype?
03/28/08 @ 09:39
Comment from: alexmagic [Member] Email
I hope the guy is taking his time to write a review of each song in the form of letters from a Ken Burns documentary to match the Raconteurs’ look in that photo.
03/28/08 @ 09:50
Comment from: dr john [Member] Email
I think Jack White is pretty good at writing straight forward rock songs (in fact, the title track off Icky Thump has stuck in my head for quite a while now).

When he gets away from this, however, the results are mixed. I think he has ventured the furthest away on the new Raconteurs album--which is why it's so flat.
03/28/08 @ 12:11
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
I volunteer myself as captain of "team doesn't give a flying fuck one way or the other about the hype around jack white and likes some of his songs in spite of it, not because of it".

this team is also known as "team one foot in both camps and therefore may appear wishy washy to the more emotionally involved among us rather than reasonable".

anybody with me?

dr. john, i think you say it just right in your post above. there are songs on every white stripes album i like alot ("sister do ya know my name?" "apple blossom"...lovely stuff).

they might be covers, they might not. i'm often not erudite enough about roots of the the vein he's tapping to know (though i know enough to know that "your southern can is mine" is a cover, duh).

either way, i don't care.

my head was too much in the sand around the time they came out to have heard the hype. but a girl i was dating had "red blood cells" and it sounded way more fun than most of the shoe-gaze crap she had in her collection. closer listens didn't tire me of the stuff.

i liked it very much. subsequent albums hit a sweet spot for me, too.

though i've never been a compulsive daily, or even weekly listener to any of their releases, hearing the early stuff usually gives me great pleasure.

but as i say above, since "get behind me satan", I've been hearing jack place more emphasis on his persona and his status as a producer. and he has also displayed a self-consciousness about putting his "musicianship" up front. as you say, it's much less stragiht forward these days.

and it's turning me off. i heard 'icky thump' on phawker and didn't even care to buy it. you can see above that i didn't really like the first racs album all that much, and am even less thrilled with this.

oh well....too bad.

03/28/08 @ 13:39
Comment from: Oats [Member]
Saturn, I am on your team!
03/28/08 @ 14:17
Comment from: homefrontradio [Member] Email
'It's True That We Love One Another' from 'Elephant' sounds suspiciously enough like 'Creque Alley' by the Mamas and The Papas, (self-referential lyrics and all), that I assumed it was a obtuse cover version when he couldn't quite remember how the original song went.
03/28/08 @ 22:16

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.

« Dugout ChatterShocking Evidence from the Year the Music Died! »