Your Unexpectedly High-Brow Take on What's Generally Considered a Low-Brow Song or Album
By Mr. Moderator on Sep 12, 2008
I'm sure you've all read some critic's unexpectedly high-brow take on what's generally considered a low-brow song or album, such as a thesis-length review of Loverboy's "Working for the Weekend", which argues that that humble song's lyrics are more meaningful and artistically honest than, say, John Lennon's "Working Class Hero". Chances are, you Deep Thinkers in the Halls of Rock have secretly harbored your own unexpected insights into what's typically considered throwaway pop. Isn't it high time you come clean and share these thoughts, thoughts which may not play at the water cooler or a cocktail party?
I look forward to your unexpected insights.
8 comments
As far as low-brow is concerned, I'm really digging the new Metallica album produced by Rick Rubin. I'm becoming more and more convinced that Rick may well be the greatest American producer. Everything the man touches is gold from Johnny Cash to Neil Diamond to The Bangles. As far as Metallica is concerned, I think it's the teen in me coming out. Plus, it's the best thing they've done since Master of Puppets. I know it's the kid in me, but I'm a closet head-banger. I get off on crunchy, metallic riffs, and double bass drumming fun. Plus, I like to hear a band seemingly past its prime kicking ass again.
Maybe the Stones should hook up with Rick? Macca?
TB
Plus, the music is damn catchy.
“Throwaway pop,” just like all other genres, has its wheat and its chaff.
TB
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.
| « iTunes Genius Sidebar: Rhyme or Reason? | FRIDAY FLASHBACK! Working Definition (cont.): Proctomusicology » |
