Comment from: BigSteve [Member] Email
This song is almost 4 minutes long, but did you realize that the na-na part starts at 2:17?!! Can you imagine recording this song and thinking 'let's polish this thing off with a minute and a half of nonsense singalong'?

And, not to play into the Mod's fantasy life, but what's with the singer's huge uh microphone? It's got some kind of enormous transformer or something at the hand end. It's kind of like watching an old TV show where a character is talking on some boxy 20 lb 'portable' telephone.
11/22/08 @ 06:26
Comment from: saturnismine [Member] Email
First of all, Mod, hilarious breakdown of the homoerotic aspects of this vid.

I remember having a similar "is she or isn't she?" experience at an only slightly later date with Nick Gilder's performance of "Hot Child In the City." The only difference is that hearing the song made me sure it was a "she," and seeing this performance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El6iQ2_dvlc

made me quickly realize that I was mistaken.

There were no soft on, or "should I be having these feelings?" moments either, but there *was* the private embarrassment at having thought to myself upon *hearing* the song without seeing its singer that "the chick who sings this song sounds pretty hot, maaaan!"

On a related note: In the early 90s, that at a party, one of my more dope addled friends claimed, to a room full of people (mixed company), that he had jagged off to pictures of "that chick from hanson."

we could hardly wait to tell him it was a young teen-aged boy. it's the stuff of legend now, and in a certain subset of philadelphia indie rockers, that story never gets old with repetition.

BigSteve as far as the song length and its proportion goes, I'd be shocked if they didn't think they were following the "hey jude" model, but condensing it to ensure airplay.
11/22/08 @ 08:29
Comment from: dbuskirk [Member] Email
I can't watch this video without feeling that my marriage is under attack.
11/22/08 @ 10:37
Comment from: andyr [Member] Email
You've been hiding that one in for a long time, Mr Mod. That's the first I've heard of this - and I'm quite glad. Back in the day, that might have been a freindship-ender
11/22/08 @ 11:02
Comment from: chickenfrank [Member]
I'd be happier if you had confessed you killed a hobo when you were a teenager rather than that you made it through an entire Journey video.

The new sticky rhino look is cool, but the ads in the right hand corner look like Gerry Todd mock-ups.
11/22/08 @ 12:42
Comment from: Mr. Moderator [Member]
Yeah, Sat, Gilder was pretty cute in his prime. I can see how you must have been diggin' the Annie Hall Look he sports in that video.
11/22/08 @ 19:45
Comment from: Telewacker [Member] Email · http://jungleofcities.com
Big Steve's observation on Journey's na-na overload brought back a funny for me.

When the White Sox were on the verge of blowing their 30-game lead to the Indians a couple three years back, for obvious reasons the team picked up 'Don't Stop Believin' as their theme song. Which worked fine during tv time outs and such.

After the Sox swept-ish thru the postseason the City held a parade and rally and of course a hundred thousand folks showed up for the celebration. And of course they had to play 'Don't Stop Believin' to fire up the faithful.

The crown went nuts when the opening keyboard riff played, then everybody kind of milled about because nobody knows any of the dumbass words to that song after the opening line. So they had to stand there stupid through two verses, the chorus, another verse, another chorus, and THE GUITAR SOLO before getting to the money shot sing-along...which of course the payoff is 'Don't Stop believing - streetlight people' a couple three times...

Talk about your rally killer.

I just clocked it out, the sploooge limps in at 3:27 in a 4:06 song...

11/23/08 @ 08:59
Comment from: diskojoe [Member] Email
Mr. Mod, I do have one question,if I can make like Arlene Francis. Did you intake anything into your body that may have affected your perception when you watched that video. Or to put it bluntly, were you drunk and/or stoned? I'm just considering the facts that 1. You were 16. 2. It was a Saturday night & 3. It was 1979.
11/24/08 @ 08:21
Comment from: Mr. Moderator [Member]
Diskojoe, sadly, I was completely sober. Not that you asked, but I think this story tells you something about the lack of action I was getting at 16.
11/24/08 @ 09:09

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.

« Dude, You Have Got to Join Rock Town Hall!All-Star Jam »