The Necessity of an Inside Job?
By Mr. Moderator on Apr 30, 2009

In a recent Dugout Chatter, Townsman pudman13 asked the following question, and ended his question with another question, which I'm answering here, on The Main Stage! (Some editing and styling have been applied to the initial comments posted.)
Are there any truly great albums (top echelon) that are not by songwriters? When I think of the albums that rank at the very top of the critical canon, none of them is packed with cover versions (and I think that it should be that way). A few that are not by songwriters are still full of "new" material, much of which was written for the performer, creating a coherent record (eg, Dusty In Memphis).
Is this question worthy of a new thread?
Yes, I think it is. Let's get it on!
To be clear, we're discussing whether it's possible to have a great (ie, stone-cold GREAT) album that is not powered by a songwriter who is in the band.
34 comments
I'm not a big fan of Dusty in Memphis, but the first artist I thought of when you posed this question was Dionne Warwick. Then I realized that I own almost nothing but hits collections by her. I think I only have one distinct album, and it's no masterpiece, just a few bricks toward completion of a hits collection.
Love AFTER MIDNIGHT by Nat Cole too.
there's a story in the liner notes about them sifting through hundreds of songs available to the label from their publishing company in order to find some of the songs that went on that album, including randy newman's "I don't want to hear it." that doesn't sound like it was written for her to me.
The problem, I think, does have to do with the rock and roll context, in which covers are almost always secondary to the original except in rare instances--a song here and there, but a whole album? Jazz has more of a history of improvisation on originals and folk has has a different relation to the issue also.
Also, obviously on this list The Byrds first record is not a stone cold classic for all of us, but it is for enough of us that I think it's not a bad answer to the question, despite Mod's anti-folk dislike of the band. But in fact the album does have classic status, despite that status being in dispute around here.
Do we need to clarify the Top Echelon? Is it the band that's Top Echelon or the album? I can't see where I'd put Dusty Springfield in either of those categories. Then again, my idea of Top Echelon is probably pretty small in either case. Too many things are considered awesome only to fade away in a couple of years.
Not that I'm much of an arbiter where that's concerned. I miss the point on a lot of the big names in rock n roll sometimes.
Also, obviously on this list The Byrds first record is not a stone cold classic for all of us, but it is for enough of us that I think it's not a bad answer to the question, despite Mod's anti-folk dislike of the band.
Why do you feel the need to characterize my feeling that The Byrds are a mediocre, toe-tap-worthy band by saying I'm against folk, that I'm against The People? I just don't think that highly of the band. I like Woody Guthrie. Is he not folk?
2K, you've nailed it with those early Stones records! I like their early covers as much as I like most of their early originals. Maybe Pudman is referring to all-covers albums, but if it's like a 50-50 mix (or less, as was the case with that Aretha album), maybe there are more than a handful of great albums that are not fueled by songwriters within the band. Or maybe, someone like myself, would argue that these fine albums are not the greatest of the great. Who knows?
Why do you feel the need to characterize my feeling that The Byrds are a mediocre, toe-tap-worthy band by saying I'm against folk, that I'm against The People? I just don't think that highly of the band. I like Woody Guthrie. Is he not folk?
Ah, Mod, we've been through this before. There are some things about the Byrds aesthetic that you don't like but we've talked about as coming from the fact of the Byrds' folk/rock dichotomy. I don't mind that you don't like the Byrds, and if you want to say that you don't like them despite your open-minded and informed history of listening to folk music, why would I bother fighting it at this point?
I'm a big fan of Jim Dickinson's "Dixie Fried" album. Don't he composed a single song.
And how about "Lady Soul" by Aretha Franklin?
I didn't mean so much to say that the songs on DUSTY IN MEMPHIS were written for that project, but I do think that for an album of "covers," it has a really consistent sound and feel.
My pick would be Fakebook by Yo La Tengo, 11 covers, 5 originals (one redone).
I can't imagine, though, what the seating configuration for a live playing of it would be. Everyone sitting in a circle, facing out?
I've never heard LET'S STICK TOGETHER, but someone once put a bunch of solo Ferry on a glam comp for me and I didn't really think much of it. Is this one of those things where you have to hear the whole album to get it? Or is it a case where people who like it generally are people who don't have much of a taste for Roxy Music?
I'm all for a Listening Section. Time permitting, I could bring some supplementary material. I have many Points about Ferry/Roxy to make.
Sam & Dave, Isaac Hayes (*Hot Buttered Soul*!), Aretha Franklin, the Jackson Five, Marvin Gaye, Staple Singers and on and on. (Marvin Gaye's *What's Going On* was a brilliant exception.)
*Dusty in Memphis* is just another example. IFRC Aretha Franklin was offered "Son of a Preacher Man" and turned it down.
It's not that unusual really.
*Young Rascals* by, um, the Young Rascals.
Great albums.
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.
| « This Is Your Rock Town Hall! | All-Star Jam » |
