Rock's Most Troubling Looks
By Mr. Moderator on Jul 12, 2009
When I asked myself which rockers possess rock's most troubling Look, the first three that came to mind were Phil Lynott, Sam Phillips (of Sun Records), and Tom Petty. I see these cats and want to reach over and show them what they're doing wrong.

Thin Lizzy's Phil Lynott has long been dead, but his Look continues to trouble me. Something's gotta give, be it the part in his Afro, the mustache, or the leather jumpsuits. His issues with Bat Wing Syndrome and his death notwithstanding, Lynott's the first rocker I'd like to breakdown in front of a miror and recast in a less-sleazy, more powerful presence. Troubling.
Follow up:

My main beef with perennially unretiring quarterback Brett Favre is his 1:1 hair-to-beard ratio. His hair and beard are always at the same length and flecked by the same amount of gray. I find the lack of contrast between head and facial hair highly disturbing. Likewise, the dyed beard that Sam Phillips favored always seemed to too closely match his dyed hair, in both color and length. It's a vision of Brett Favre, finally retired and gone to seed. Highly troubling!

What was once a cool display of '70s stoner chic, Tom Petty's receding hairline has made his center part untenable. It's more of a center sprout. Immediate action required.
Do you ever feel this way about the any rockers? I'm not taking rockers with a bad Look, necessarily, like Brett Michaels and his dual efforts at covering his baldness, but a Look that's in serious need of a makeover, a "wrong" Look, if you will, on a rocker who could easily do better.
25 comments
Petty managed to eek out a modicum of cool in his early days. Not bad for a fundamentally unattractive man. Time caught up with him. It happens.
Sam Phillips had a bad look, yes. But he was from a completely different time and region than me. I can't expect him to conform to my ideas of cool.
I hate Costello's current look -- something out of a Joel Schumacher Batman movie. And those hats -- ugh!
I like the way you characterize Costello's present look! The way those Batman/Dick Tracy movie suits bunch up on him make me uncomfortable. This is exactly the sort of troubling Look I want to hear about from Townspeople.
In general I think Dylan has earned the right to do whatever he wants to do, but he's had several troubling Look eras. The roving gypsy Look of the Desire era were the spangly entertainer of the Street Legal era were the most obviously problematical. I think he's done almost every Look except suit and tie, though in the 80s he did try the white sportjacket with the sleeves rolled up Look. On the other hand, he's always been about covering a lot of ground with various cultural reference points while still retaining his essential Dylanness, so the parade of Looks has a kind of logic. And whatever the Look, it generally reflects the music somehow, like the current riverboat gambler Look.
I probably like Bono a lot more than most people in these parts, but his current Look has reached a point of no return. He and Jeff Lynne need to be taken to eyewear counseling.
And Bono's short back and sides combined with excessive Just For Men use is wearing thin. My advice is low profile specs and letting the grey show. He's even got Joyce and Beckett giving him great role models for the artistic Irishman Look:
http://www.thesharkguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/james-joyce.jpg
http://www.arcadepub.com/resources/persons/338.gif
I'm with you on Dylan and Bono, too.
EC's current Look is not as troubling as that bearded look he had circa 1991 which planted the 1st seeds of doubt in my fanhood.
Finally, here's a Look that's rather troubling. I can't believe that this group was popular in the UK back in the day. The song's actually not half bad, but the Look takes something away:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2sMuVPMkkk
EC's current Look is not as troubling as that bearded look he had circa 1991 which planted the 1st seeds of doubt in my fanhood.
I disagree. Can this be the new poll?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Greatest-Hits-Mud/dp/B00004SRK7/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1247509269&sr=8-1
here's the link to the article where i found the pic.
HERE
what in the mother-freak IS that?
thanks, too, for explaining this to me.
did reporters ask him what in the HELL he was doing?
was there a rock look ideology behind this? was bob taking the same cynical approach to *look* that we here at RTH take?
on another note, I've been thinking about this Samue / Bowa / Greg Gross thing all day. I wish we could give Greg Gross Juan Samuel's fielding utility and Larry Bowa's spark. It would be good to have a guy like that rounding out your team, ya know?
i meant to thank oats for providing the explanation. the phils comment is addressed to the mod.
but of the three, Greg Gross definitely had the most troubling look:
http://www.nerdbaseball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/gross-greg2.jpg
http://slog.thestranger.com/files/2008/03/garry_maddox.jpg
and another troubling rock look:
http://www.poster.net/boy-george/boy-george-photo-xl-boy-george-6227175.jpg
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.
| « All-Star Jam | Let's See You Pipe-Tamp, Brandy-Snift and Leather-Elbow-Patch Your Way Out Of THIS One, Dr. John! » |
