GREAT!

 Posted by
Jul 132008
 

Here at Rock Town Hall we often make claims for a record or artist or album cover or concert or producer or what have you as being GREAT [caps and italics for emphasis]! But what do we mean by this term? We nod our heads or disagree vehemently, as if we understand what it means, but until this RTH Glossary entry, suggested by Townsman Mwall, I’m not sure that we’ve ever been able to reach agreement on what the designation GREAT means. Listen to this Lou guy, in the following clip. I think his recounting of a GREAT concert he attended – and the telling of his experiences – clearly illustrate once and for all what’s meant when any of us proclaim something in the world of rock as GREAT!

Share
Jul 122008
 


Almost forget about your anniversary and need to get your woman something fast? You won’t go wrong with this album. You know what they say about all the great singers: “So-and-so could sing the phone book and make it sound good!” On Lay It Down, Al Green’s continued return to secular recording, the reverend has ?uestlove and James Poyser behind the board and in the band – it’s not exactly the phone book he sings with such mastery but Hallmark-wortthy inspirational platitudes.

Be that as it may, the considerable strengths of this album, which also includes tastefully marketing-driven cameos by contemporary artists John Legend, Corrine Bailey Ray, and Anthony Hamilton, are Green’s voice and the comfortable arrangements in which that voice is set. Each track works off the classic template of Green’s Willie Mitchell-produced ’70s albums, most notably the title track, but in a way that skirts the common problem comebacking legends sometimes face when being slavishly produced by younger acolytes. ?uestlove’s warm, flat drums and Spanky Alford‘s jazzy guitar fills are mixed front and center in ways not often heard on contemporary albums (when’s the last time I’ve heard so many tasty guitar fills peeking out through an entire pop album), but the arrangements are more romantic and sweeping than Green’s more idiosyncratic work from the ’70s. On songs like “You’ve Got the Love I Need” and “Too Much” I imagine what Gamble and Huff might have done with Green after he’d run his initial course with Mitchell and before he departed the pop music world with The Belle Album.

Al Green, “You’ve Got the Love I Need”

Al Green, “Too Much”

For all that’s solid and right about this album, the one thing that’s not resonating with me is how placcid the lyrics are. The joy of a song like “Just For Me” is palpable. But then it’s 10 songs later, with Green still expressing nothing but complete content with the love of his life, and I might as well be sitting among the choir, singing the praises of the Lord. I don’t wish the man trouble and doubt, but as a listener I hope to hear a sense of questioning and discovery from the artist. At one point in the 1984 documentary, Gospel According to Al Green, a long conversation with the Rev. Al Green that is open to nothing but questioning and discovery, Green talks about his love and longing for God being much more satisfying for him to write and sing about than the love and longing he had for any woman in his pop star days. He’s sitting in his ’80s-era minister get-up as he says this, with a guitar in his lap. Then he starts playing one of his massive, ’70s pop hits – the kind he’d just dismissed, and you can’t help but wonder where the lines are drawn in this guy’s psyche. I get goosebumps just thinking of this half-remembered scene, but on Lay It Down, despite strong performances in all areas, there’s no sense of those zig-zagging lines, no goosebumps. To paraphrase that key line in “Belle,” “Oh, it’s secular Al records that I want, but it’s Green that I need.”

Share
Jul 112008
 

It is, of course, possible for a ageing rocker to conquer his addictions, as Eric Clapton has proved. But one of Wood’s friends said yesterday: ‘I don’t know that Ronnie will ever straighten out.

‘For him, drinking goes hand in hand with having fun, and he’d rather be dead than be boring. I remember him saying to me when he went into rehab, “The thing is, I don’t want to end up being a boring b*****d like Clapton”.’

Here’s a pretty sad tale regarding the Stone whose fans need not apply to our hallowed Hall. I like Stones-related dirt as much as the next guy, but damn…they shoot horses, don’t they? Ron, don’t go!

E. Pluribus Gergely, this clip’s for you.

Previously, in the News!

Share
Jul 112008
 

Folks, earlier today, a woman friend — a married one, at that — forwarded me this link, asking if she ought to feel bad for not knowing what the heck a “bat wing syndrome” was. I assured her that I, too, was clueless, despite the fact that I am in fact a man, with a scrotum. I turn to the Hall for answers. Note that I have no interest in understanding what it means as it pertains to itchy, smelly nut-satchels. I’m more curious to know what it may describe in the world of Rock. Does it describe, perhaps, the way a guitarist might hold his arms out at his sides after delivering a particularly crushing power chord? A bassist’s penchant for pointy guitars? What?

Share
Jul 112008
 


The Great 48 dropped a fun line and radio snippet the other day that I thought you might dig. The Great One wrote:

I emailed the hosts of that AM radio show I mentioned in the Little Jackie piece, which resulted in a lengthy discussion including this plug of the board. I’ll take credit for any infusion of new blood.

As you should, Great One. Thanks! Here’s the clip:

Rock Town Hall Is On the Air! (excerpt of on-air discussion from Too Beautiful To Live)

Share
Jul 112008
 


Although Rock Town Hall has partnered with the Apple Empire and iTunes and values them greatly, there are days when we suddenly find ourselves simply hating something about our iPod/iTunes experience. For me, that one of those days was Monday night, when I was burning CDs that my young son sequenced and wanted to give his friends at his 7th birthday party.

I might have told a few of you about my boys’ getting into ELO over recent months and my realization that I owned exactly 0 ELO albums. To rectify that situation and acquire 15 ELO tracks I thought would be healthy for my boys to enjoy, I went on iTunes and legally bought the band’s best material – what I consider their best material, because lord knows they’ve got a spotty run of Greatest Hits albums in their catalog. The boys have been digging this hand-picked Best of ELO CD ever since.

So Monday night I’m working on my boy’s ELO-heavy compilation CD for the 8 friends he’s invited to his birthday party. iTunes has burned the first 7 CDs efficiently. What a marvel of modern technology!, I thought to myself. Then, when I pop in the 8th CD I get a message to the effect of, “You are only licensed to make 7 copies of music purchased from iTunes.”

BASTARDS! Apple’s put a digital fence around the 15 ELO tracks I purchased from them. I’m sure this was all spelled out in the User Agreement that I insincerely clicked Yes to when asked if I’d read it, but come on! This was supposed to by my sons’ ELO, as selected with care by their rock snob father. At that moment I cursed the Apple Empire. A couple of days later and I’m still reluctant to use any of the Apple software on my Mac. I’ll get over it and return to singing the praises of iPods and iTunes, I’m sure, but today I’m still feeling the hate.

How about you? Please complete the phrase in the title of this post. Tell us what you hate about iPods or iTunes. In those rare times when you’re feeling the hate, that is.

Share

Lost Password?

 
twitter facebook youtube