American Hare
At the risk of being completely wrong and making a sweeping generalization, let me share an American thought. As I sat and watched the fireworks in our town tonight – and as mostly horrendous rock songs vaguely associated with the pride we feel as Americans as we re-create the rockets’ red glare – I got to thinking about that late-period, minor X hit, “Fourth of July”, or something like that. It’s a staple of AAA radio and other Coffee Table Rock outlets, but not the kind of thing you’d hear at a suburban town’s fireworks display, sandwiched between Mellencamp, Springsteen, and Diamond’s patriotic numbers. Man that song’s a real lowpoint in the already creatively spent portion of X’s career at that point!
American Wear
So I got to thinking: Why do so few American bands develop? In places like these hallowed Halls of Rock, we can go on for days, weeks, months on the various phases of any of a number of British bands, such as The Beatles, The Stones, The Kinks, The Who, Roxy Music, Elvis Costello, U2, and so on. Beside Bob Dylan, who developed from somewhat-traditional-yet-edgy folk singer to Voice of His Generation to wizened husk of his glorious self in a scant 8 or so years, who among American rock artists has developed as far as three distinct, interesting phases over the course of their career? Canadian artists who seem American, like Neil Young and Joni Mitchell, don’t count.
I can think of Los Lobos. And The Doors. And The Velvet Underground. Probably a few more, but this isn’t going to turn into Monty Python’s Spanish Inquisition sketch.
Like X, most American bands that come out of the gate on fire quickly fizzle into some low-grade version of their original American greatness: CCR, The Ramones, even Chuck Berry and his Mercury releases. There are no “phases,” no periods of development. Just the end or, worse, a painfully slow decline.
There’s the rare band like Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers, who have managed to maintain a consistently good level of the same old, same old. There’s also the rare band like Aerosmith, who managed to re-imagine themselves as an enjoyable, reliable “brand” that merely hints at what they once were.
What is it with our bands? Is it something about “American music” itself that limits development, or is it something about the American aesthetic? Perhaps I’m way off base. I look forward to your thoughts on this day of American independence!