Huge Rock Songs That Were in No Way "Influential"
By Mr. Moderator on Apr 9, 2009
In our recent investigation of rock's most pompous singer, Townsman and major Queen fan 2000 Man directed us to this delusional video clip on The Story of "Bohemian Rhapsody." Already-forgotten bands like The Darkness proclaim the song as "the Holy Grail," then go on to say that if anyone says they don't like "Bohemian Rhapsody" they're lying!
Well, call me a liar. I'll argue that not only do I not like the song but that the song itself has almost no influence on anything that came after it. You could argue that the joy and flamboyance of Freddie Mercury was inspiring to some future gay (and straight) frontmen. You could argue that the band's production techniques were influential on '80s hair metal bands. But I don't see how you can argue that "Bohemian Rhapsody" was influential on any song that would follow in the history of rock to date.
I could argue that the song completed work started by Paul McCartney and Wings through various cut-and-paste songs, from "Uncle Albert/Uncle Halsey" through "Band on the Run" and "Live and Let Die," but once Queen so perfectly completed McCartney's artistically suspect efforts, no band had a chance of following in "Bo Rhap"'s footsteps. Queen was too good at that shit! Despite the fact that I can't stand "Bo Rhap," it's a masterpiece of execution. But it's not influential.
Are there other huge rock songs that would be, for whatever reasons, in no way "influential?"
34 comments
"How Soon Is Now" would be another song in this side-thread, bands who never re-captured the sound of their biggest hits...
I never got the appeal of that song. That guitar with the tremelo has a great tone but the song itself is big "meh".
I like that club song that sampled it in the early '90s (The Hippie Chick?) much better than the song itself. Maybe that's a Battle Royale: Songs that sample another song and are better than the original.
The guitar sound IS the appeal of How Soon Is Now. A great guitar sound like that can take you a long ways.
DiskoJoe, I think The Who never played I Can See For Miles because Bernard Purdie wasn't available for tours, only studio work.
just because we've "never heard anyting quite like" a particular song doesn't mean it wasn't influential.
rhapsody and stairway are both songs that, at the time, suggested possibilities to rock musicians that they hadn't considered. certain features of both songs may have made them feel like they had a broader set of options than before, more "places" to take their songwriting, than they originally thought they had.
so the results of the impact of these songs don't have to *sound like mimicry or rewrites of them*.
even the general notion that "hey, these guys threw out the tried and true and did whateverthefuck they wanted...so i'm really gonna push that idea that my label won't let me pursue" is influence enough.
and i'm sure that after each of those songs came out, there were scads of long hairs in office and conference rooms saying "look man...bloody QUEEN scored a number one when THEIR label reated them like artists instad of cash cows! give ME that freedom, too!!"
If the influence of Bo Rhap and Stair Heav lies not in their sound but in the encouragement to be more original, then every successful and original sounding record ever made is not only influential but influential in exactly the same way.
It's like saying Slade's two-guitar-bass-and-drums lineup was influential because it convinced musicians that that particular format could work. How many times does that lesson have to be learned?
When we speak of a song as being influential, we usually are referring to attributes that are specific to that song.
I'm waiting for the rock docu where some artist, somewhere, declares the first Boston album "influential." I'm willing to bet that will never happen.
That's too bad, because the first Boston album is the belt-holder in the category of Influential Album That No One Gives Credit To. All - all - of faceless '80s rock is in there.
How come the Door's cataloge hasn't been reissued and given a 10 by pitchfork? I don't hear much of their influence on much indie music. i might be missing something though.
Their back catalog has been reissued repeatedly, but I guess it's been mostly bought by guys who don't form bands.
Specifically, you appear to be missing the very existence of Echo and the Bunnymen.
The Doors. I wouldn't say that The Doors suck (I'm not a huge fan), but I will say that they are unique. While lots of bands sound like The Beatles or Boston, not many sound like The Doors. Their influence isn't as evident as many others. Not too many bands sound like The Doors.
I might agree that "Bo Rhap" is larger than its influence. Even "Stairway" had its aftershocks, but "Bo Rhap" is in a league of its own.
TB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTheG--2NE0
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.
| « Rock Town Hall Strives to Improve Rock Criticism Through Avoidance of Rock-Crit Cliches | Least Objectionable Billy Joel Song or New Shortest Post Ever » |
