Jan 152008
 

Blurp, blurp, blurp, blurp, blurp…

I’ve been looking forward to this one for a couple of years, since a friend turned me onto Malkmus’ last album, Face the Truth. I haven’t anticipated an artist’s next release like this one for some time. My hope and optimism are bound to let me down. Here goes!

“Dragonfly Pie”: I’m digging the rumbling fuzz guitars and the overall sinister vibe as this one gets underway. Wait a second! It’s getting light and airy, with falsetto singing and a cheap electric piano sound. Ah, back to the distorted, double-stop guitar licks and the sloppy buzzing sound. Truth be told, this is a pretty lame song, but so many modern albums start out with sloppy mood pieces. Shoot, he’s back to the falsetto-$20 electric keyboard chorus, but now he’s back to the the simplistic, mind-and-string-bending solos I so crave. Dig those analog synth noodlings. All right, ended just in time.

“Hopscotch Willie”: This song title scares me. I’m sensing a Steely Dan song of some sort, maybe by way of Frank Zappa. So far this one’s meandering along in a poor man’s Steely Dan way. The song is still young, though. There’s plenty of time for some fuzzed-out string bending. Here’s a different kind of solo, more ’70s, a bit like the solo in Face the Truth‘s super “No More Shoes”. One big difference: the slight “Hopscotch Willie” tune surrounding the solo doesn’t go anywhere. Patience, Ed, patience… Now the song has broken down to a little rickety piano and vocal section before Malkmus takes it into some almost Santana-like jamming. Come on, man, I’ve been counting on this album.

“Cold Son”: This song may grow on me. It’s a bit stilted with a smooth chorus stuck between all the jagged edges. Don’t know what else to make of it on first listen.

“Real Emotional Trash”: Ooh, the title track promises something special! It starts out delicately, the tension building ever so slightly only to get sidetracked by some pretty chord or melodic twist. I’m telling you, though, it’s going to kick any minute now. Ah, listen to those tasty guitar runs. “Daddy’s on the run…” Can you feel it building? Yeah, check out this dual-guitar climb, like the gateway to some extended Television jam. Yeah, baby! Stomp on those effects boxes, play that guitar! Blurp blurp blurp blurp goes my bong. “I’m gonna start doing something with my life, mannnn!” Now the wah-wah pedal has been initiated! Blurp blurp blurp blurp… Pick up the pace, a chooglin’ piano is playing what sounds like The Doors’ “L.A. Woman”! Malkmus is back on vocals, singing of “Frisco” and other Doors-worthy nonsense. This is what I need! Now another dual-guitar solo segment kicks in, this one in a scale that The Allman Brothers might play. I think it’s winding down. I’m fried, man. Tender section, like something Lou Reed and Robert Quine might have played on The Blue Mask. Wonder if they stuck stereo mics on a Styrofoam dummy’s head?
Continue reading »

Share
Jan 142008
 

It’s tougher than it seems to make a common, bad song eternally annoying. Try it sometime. It only seems easy because Tom Cruise has managed this feat in countless Hollywood films.

In charging Tom Cruise with Rock Crimes for permanently defiling more downtrodden songs than any actor in history, we’re not passing judgment on his films, his beliefs, or his personal life. We won’t even poke fun at all the ditches in which his leading ladies have had to stand while sidling up to him.

There’s gonna be no dancing

Likewise, we’re not going to pass judgment on the songs themselves. At least one of these songs is actually of high caliber. Although Cruise typically preyed on weaker material, he was capable of bringing down classier numbers.

Here’s a song that sucks in what’s actually a good film. This song is so bad and emblematic of its time that it would be remembered as a stone-cold turd without Cruise’s involvement. However, his pool-cue moves denigrate this song beyond all hopes of simply being forgotten among a brothel full of Clapton’s ’80s skanks.

Share
Jan 142008
 

Updated at page 3 with visual-free audio files for potentially less-biased consideration! (Courtesy of shawnkilroy and The Great 48.)

Let’s stop the nonsense, shall we? You don’t really like Sparks, do you?

Perhaps you were really into Queen as a youth and needed another band that was remotely like them in your collection? If so, that’s cool. No need to explain.

Perhaps you were totally into the Ice Capades and these guys turned you onto The Power and Glory of Rock? OK, I can see that.

But plenty of critics and rock ‘n roll fans whose tastes I respect LOVE these guys. Have I had the bad luck of only hearing the likes of my man, Townsman The Great 48, rave about them on April 1? Stop putting me on, will ya.

Share
Jan 142008
 

It’s 2008’s first edition of Dugout Chatter. If you don’t know how it works, do what other Townspeople have been doing. Just share your gut answers to the following questions and you can’t go wrong!

Is “electronics” code for “synth-pop I like”?

Who’s rock’s Most Valuable Oliver?

Which possibly overrated band is least appreciated for its frequently overlooked strengths: Cream or The Doors?

Which Beatles song suffered more from the absence of George Martin: “She’s Leaving Home” or “The Long and Winding Road”?

Which artist manager had the greatest influence on rock ‘n roll?

Here’s a trick one: Which part of the legacy of a band you love least matters to you?

Share
Jan 132008
 

I’ve learned that my Tin Machine video featuring staged stage diving is no longer available on YouTube. Part of me is sad, while another part of me is proud of having shamed the owner of said video into taking it down. However, I sense you’re disappointed. To make up for the teaser of a long-forgotten Tin Machine video, I’m offering you three momentous looks back at the band – honest – Tin Machine. Enjoy, and feel free to share your memories of bands involving already-famous solo artists that really were a group. Really!

First up, an interview with the group – the whole group – on Arsenio.

Next, the countdown to the group’s first televised performance!

Share
Jan 102008
 

Hey, folks,

So I was out walking the pooch the other day, earbuds in place (uncharacteristically so — Mod, I may be coming around to your perspective on these things; increasingly, I find I favor the sound of the wind through the trees over bonus tracks from the most recent Apples In Stereo album… but I digress) — anyhow, earbuds in place — when I experienced a somewhat jarring alphabetic song transition that really got me thinking. The first song that popped into my earbones was this one: Track One.

Now, understand, I love this song. And I also have some firmly rooted opinions about its Importance. But when this track followed it into my brain, I really had to stop and think: Track Two.

My first reaction, strangely enough, was one of, um, relief. In other words, though I enjoyed bobbing my head to Track One as it coursed through my head, I was pleased to listen to Track Two in comparison. This actually concerned me a bit. In an effort to allay fears about my taste in pop music, and how it might be in the process of geezification, I’ve been re-cue-ing this tune at odd intervals over the last four or five days — to make sure I wasn’t just liking Track Two more, you know, because I was strolling through the park on a pleasant winter’s day or something. Nope. I’m definitely liking this song more than Track One.

So I asked myself: why? And in the process, I came up with a few questions I’d like to pass along to all of you. Listen to these two tracks. (And I ask you to actually listen to them, in their entirety, before answering. I know you know both songs in question; for me, it was the *re*-listening that brought these issues into clear focus. Humor me.)

After listening, answer the following questions:

1. Which of these two songs do you think actually had the most, uh, measurable impact on day-to-day human behavior during its popularity? I seriously think that more people — though perhaps in a more modest, immediate, fleeting fashion — changed their behavior, or at least felt differently about themselves, upon hearing what Track Two had to say, than Track One.

2. Imagine you have an iTunes playlist of two songs: Track One and Track Two. Which are you likely to listen to more often, today? Please try to avoid wishful, rearview mirror-gazing/too-cool-for-school responses to this question.

3. Today, are there any popular — or even just critically popular — artists mining the veins these two artists explored 30 years ago?

I look forward to your responses.

HVB

Share

Lost Password?

 
twitter facebook youtube