Mr. Moderator

Mr. Moderator

When not blogging Mr. Moderator enjoys baseball, cooking, and falconry.

Jun 282007
 

As all but the most tolerant, patient, and dedicated fans of Nick Lowe probably agree, shortly after Nick’s first two albums, the lone Rockpile album, and the breakup of the entire Rockpile working arrangement, the guy’s career hit a long stretch of mostly unsatisfying releases. Surely one of us is a greater fan of Nick the Knife or Party of One than the rest of us, and there’s probably even a Nick Lowe fan who regrets his breaking up His Cowboy Outfit, but let’s be honest, the guy lost his spark when he lost that Rockpile crew and from all accounts began changing as a person.

Lowe’s reemergence as an unabashedly adult artist following the release of 1994’s The Impossible Bird or 1998’s Dig My Mood, depending on when you began paying him any attention again, was a welcome and inspiring reemergence. I loved hearing this guy who’d always had a facility for classic pop traditions bear down and confront them head on. How many more mediocre to bad releases would it have taken to convince me that the guy could no longer turn pop conventions on their ear? The guy could have released 100 more albums in a “rocking” vein and never come up with another “I Love the Sound of Breaking Glass” or the exquisite “Cruel to Be Kind”. That’s cool, and what’s cooler is that he had the great sense to get out of the Jesus of Cool business and embrace the pop conventions that have always been at the core of his work.

Jesus Has Left the Building

In an interview with Terry Gross on Fresh Air around the time of one of these mature albums, Terry asked Nick if there was a song that he loved that might suprise his fans. (This is a great question that Gross has asked musical guests over the years, and it could be a good thread for us here at Rock Town Hall someday, so keep it in mind.) Lowe’s song was Tommy Edwards’ ballad “It’s All in the Game”. He picked up his acoustic guitar and played a few measures of the song. It made so much sense, especially with his new direction. Dig My Mood and the follow up, The Convincer, each contained a few songs in that style (along with strong hints of Nat King Cole and The Platters). When he wasn’t crooning on those fine albums he was doing the sort of country-soul identified with the songwriting and production of Spooner Oldham and Dan Penn. His whole “changed man”/”man who’s finally found love” lyrical stance comes through loud and clear on these recordings, and I find them moving despite the “coffee table rock” aspects of The Convincer, in particular.

That brings us to his new release, At My Age. The whole adult rock/changed man thing continues to be at the foundation of his work and his publicity campaign, and that’s all cool. The songs on this album are highly reminiscent of songs from his previous “mature” works, and as far as dedication to craft goes, this is somewhat cool. The arrangements and recordings are still display tremendous taste and understatement, which is very cool, but I’m not sure that I’m cool with the same batch of songs, the same lyrics, the same stance. If Lowe has dedicated golden years of his career to recrafting classic pre-Beatles pop, is he hitting the wall that halted the great works of Lieber and Stoller and associated artists, like The Drifters? Is there a reason that great stuff went by the wayside that has nothing to do with racial ceilings and moptops?

I know some of you would like me to shut up with the backstory and talk about some of the album’s finest tracks, like “Long Limbed Girl”, “Hope for Us All”, and “I Trained Her to Love Me”. That’s cool. You’re excited to hear a report on his breezy collaboration with former student and flame, Chrissie Hynde, on the breezy, insignificant “People Change”. That’s cool too. I’ll tell you what, how about listening to the songs sampled here and digging them for yourself, discussing them as you see fit? Just click on the song titles with the mp3 links.

If there’s any problem with this album it’s that Nick and I are aging at different rates. As much as I appreciate him setting a dignified pace for rockers in their 50s – and believe me, this is a solid, enjoyable album and heads and shoulders above cynical “golden years” crap like that series of Rod Stewart Trashes the American Masters releases – I’m not ready to slow down that much yet. I want to hear Nick lash out at just one classic pop convention now and then. I know he’s a changed man. I know he’s finally found love, but he finally found that love 10 years ago. It’s time I hear about something slightly new, pitched somewhere slightly new. We can work through this together, I’m sure, Nick. If all works out, I’ll be your age one day too, and I’d rather feel what you’re feeling than whatever it is crotchety old Bob Dylan‘s feeling on his recent releases. Maybe Bob is still putting up a fight, but I wish he’d include a tune along the way, just as I’d like to hear Nick kick back the slightest bit. That’s cool, isn’t it?

Share
Jun 272007
 


A few Townspeople have been bugging me to restate my opinion that The Rolling Stones’ Beggars Banquet is the worst of the great Stones albums. I’ve been holding off on doing this for a few reasons, including the following:

  • I’ve been really busy and I don’t want to give this topic anything less than my full attention.
  • I’m loathe to have to define “great Stones albums.”
  • I’ve been really busy and haven’t wanted to waste any of my precious time on all those “blackface” acoustic, dusty porch-blues numbers that litter that album.

As I’ve fiddled, Rock Town Hall’s dugout has started to smoulder with dialog such as the following:

Townsman Hrrundi: What’s wrong with you, boy? I just gave “Beggars Banquet” a quick scan for a reality check, and I was right — it’s a stinker! It’s got a few strong — in one or two cases, crucially important — Stones tracks, but in general, the album is chock-a-block with the worst kind of pretendo-country/blues nonsense. Really. I’ll give you “Street Fighting Man” and “Stray Cat Blues” — those are songs where the Stones actually bring something unique and Stonesian to the table. But all those acoustic snoozers? Gimme a break! Music to clean the bong by!

Townsman Epluribusgergely: Beggar’s Banquet will never be an LP for your ears. Why? 1) It doesn’t have your beloved written and recorded at Sam Ash sound that Aerosmith too favored when they recorded their version of “Walkin’ the Dog.” 2) There’s an originality in the pseudo country blues numbers that you’re not hearing, i.e. taking Harry Smith anthology material and making it dirtier, ethics and style wise. 3) There’s an overall emphasis on acoustic instruments. And 4) They thought Bob Dylan was good…

Although I’m impressed by Hrrundi’s opening salvo, I can’t trust that this discussion will proceed toward the final, necessary point without my involvement, so let’s get it on!
Continue reading »

Share
Jun 272007
 

One of an occasional rock-related travel pieces submitted by a Townsman or Townswoman on the road! In today’s report, from a recent trip to Japan, Hrrundi lets his picture speak a thousand words. He adds only a mere 23 additional words to the story. Enjoy!

“This would be funny if it wasn’t one of the best record stores I’ve ever been to — you’d crap your pants in there!”
Share
Jun 272007
 


More than a few of you may be aware of my love for Roy Wood’s solo masterpiece, Boulders. This one-man band outing represents, for me, a landmark in Prock, that is the as-yet-not-fully defined subgenre of progressively self-referential rock and pop music.

Wake Up
Rock Down Low

You may have heard my spiel before, even if you’ve never heard the album. You may have heard the album before, but even if you couldn’t stand it, I encourage you to grab a copy out of a dollar bin – hell, sadly almost no one wants their old copy – and listen to it in order, preferably a few times. I believe it’s an album of obsessive, whimsical craft and strange beauty. You’ve heard me rattle on about a song’s ability to meet the True Objectives of Rock. An album like this one surely was not part of the original plan. However, in the post-Sgt. Pepper’s era, when the artifact of a rock ‘n roll recording and album could hold as much value as the record’s emotional and rhythmic content, a special place was carved out for rock ‘n roll shut-ins to enjoy in the privacy of their own room. Boulders is just such an album. Do not expect to throw this on at a party and proceed to high-five your friends. See if you can stick in there for the first three tracks, and then see if you can hang on through track 7. If you can get that far, I beg of you to hold tight for track 9, the aptly named “Rock Medley”.

Effin’ Jeff Lynne! The guy used every move in Wood’s book, dating back to his pre-Lynne work with The Move through this stuff and the worst boogie-glam of Wizzard. Wood was the real deal, so real that he often sucked in his overreaching, high-concept flights of fancy. I don’t mean to get down on Jeff Lynne too much, because a Townsman played me the new album by that 40-piece band in the brightly colored robes. My god, Jeff Lynne’s worst work with ELO outshines that crap, but Lynne never put his Prock talents to work on such an inner plane as Wood did on Boulders. This album is sorely in need of some explanation. I’ve got some questions for Wood, and don’t think I haven’t been trying to track him down.

Share
Jun 262007
 

Work it now, work it!

What’s your favorite aside in a song (eg, Jimi’s “Move over Rover, and let Jimi take over!”)?

What’s your “go-to” insincere compliment for a show or record you really don’t like a whole lot?

What’s the most overrated studio overdub (ie, not part of the band’s standard live arrangement and not including double-tracking)?

What’s the worst part in a song you otherwise like?

Have you heard the new albums by Bryan Ferry and Nick Lowe, both due out today?

If 2000 Man can see the need for rewriting rock history through a Stones perspective, through what perspective could you imagine yourself rewriting rock history – provided you had the time, of course?

I look forward to your responses.

Share
Jun 262007
 

Rock of Ages

Tonight on Larry King Live, Larry host surviving Beatles Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr along with surviving Beatles brides Yoko Ono and Olivia Harrison. King is sxpected to make his case for being crowned the Fifth Beatle. Says a rep for King, “Although Larry respects the decision of Rock Town Hall to crown George Martin as the Fifth Beatle once and for all, Larry hopes, if nothing else, to ensure a higher ranking than Philadelphia broadcasting legend Larry Kane.”

The interview will also include Cirque du Soleil founder Guy LaLiberte, as The Beatles’ tribute Love celebrates its 1-year anniversary playing in Las Vegas. It is expected that The Beatles families will thank LaLiberte and his group for doing their part to ensure that no present or future member of the extended families of McCartney, Lennon, Harrison, and Starr will ever have to work through the year 3017.

You can send in questions for Larry to ask the band here. No joke; he’s going to need help forming a few coherent questions. Please copy Rock Town Hall on your questions in the Comments section. Thanks.

Share

Lost Password?

 
twitter facebook youtube